bhench*d, gaali mat de…
April 12, 2006I apologize for the abusive title of this post, but tell me haven’t you heard this statement before when you saw some people quarrelling on a railway station or bus stop? It sounds so weird and disturbingly funny, right? That a person starts abusing when he wants the other person to stop abusing him.
This human nature is precisely what I want to talk about today. This kind of nature is so much prevalent among us, and most of the people practice such nature, sometimes without even realizing it.
We’ve had the classic example of much talked and rioted about Danish Cartoons. The entire so called progressive world cried foul saying that this was an attack on freedom of expression, and they condemned the protests which were happening in some parts of the world. In other words they wanted their freedom of expression, but they were not ready to take any criticism of the cartoons, thus not willing to give the same freedom of expression to those who did not like cartoons. On the other hand protestors turned violent and rioted public property of their own country and killed people from their own country and community. How weird and stupid can we humans get?
How many times have we seen people condemning one religion for fundamentalism, and then in order to face the challenge of fundamentalism of that other religion, they turn towards fundamentalism of their religion.
Don’t we see how the rich and mighty countries of the first world are trying their best towards the noble cause of world peace only by threatening other countries of dire consequences if they did not agree?
I have seen many people who claim to be rational, and while they chide someone for being irrational they themselves become irrational. There are people who claim to be firm believers of the philosophy of Ayn Rand, and then they go around showing off that they’ve read all of her books.
Only today I was reading a blog, where someone wrote a comment saying that a blog is a personal space, and the owner has all the rights to write whatever he or she feels like. In the same breath this person continued that disabling comments on a blog post is undemocratic, and it should not be done. Now if my blog is ‘my space’, and I have all the rights to convey my thoughts through it, don’t I have all the rights to decide if I want someone to comment on it or not? Another funny thing i read there was about comment moderation being accepted but disabling comments being termed as wrong. Now in my opinion, disabling comments and moderation are almost similar. The only difference being that when u have comment moderation, you can choose only those comments which you like and leave the ones you dont, whereas while disabling comments altogether you skip both favorable as well as unfavorable comments. So what’s the big deal? Why so much fuss about moderation and/or disabling? and that too when you are supposedly in favor of freedom of expression on one’s blog.
If only we can learn to practice what we preach, the world would be a much better place.
~—~
I know this post was a bit on a heavier side, so I leave you with this piece of news which just came in:
15000 atheists in London rioted after a blank sheet of paper was found on a cartoonist’s desk!
via :-)



